EA Survey 2

Name*

First Last

Email*

Enter Email Confirm Email

Would you like to see changes in the next Enterprise Agreement to Part II Renumeration and Classification Structure?*

Yes
No
Unsure

Please expand on your ideas for changes to Part II Renumeration and Classification Structure.

Would you like to see any changes to Section 9 Renumeration Structure?*

Yes
No
Unsure

Please expand on your ideas for changes to Section 9 Renumeration Structure?

Do you believe that the present salary scale adequately reflects the work standards and responsibilities of roles (Section 10. Classification Structure)?*

Yes
No
Unsure

Please expand on your idea for changes to Section 10 on Classification Structure.

Would you like to see any changes to Section 11 Broadband and Advancement Arrangements?*

Yes
No
Unsure

Please expand on your idea for changes to Section 11 Broadband and Advancement Arrangements

Have you experienced any issues relating to Casual Employment (Section 12)?*

Yes
No
Not relevant to me

Please explain the issues you encountered.

Would you like to see any changes to Section 12 Casual Employment?*

Yes
No
Unsure

Please expand on your idea for changes to Section 12 Casual Employment.

Would you like to see any changes to Section 13 Entry Level Programs?*

Yes
No
Unsure

Please expand on your idea for changes to Section 13 Entry Level Programs?

Do you believe that any changes are needed to Section 14 Flexible Renumeration Packaging (Salary Packaging) to reflect broader salary sacrifice arrangements (e.g. mortgage, rent, childcare, laptop, etc)?*

Yes
No
Unsure

Please expand on your idea for changes to Section 14 Flexible Renumeration Packaging (Salary Packaging)?

Would you like to see any changes to Section 15 Superannuation?*

Yes
No
Unsure

Please expand on your suggestions for changes to Section 15 Superannuation.

Performance Development Agreement Process

Do you think that the existing 12-month PDA cycle is an adequate period over which to set goals and have meaningful discussions about your career and performance?*

Yes, I do not believe it requires any change
No, it needs attention as I believe that 12 months is too long a timeframe, between formal discussions with my Team Leader and think that it should return to a 6- month PDA cycle

Setting and achieving effective performance management is considered to be one of the goals of the PDA process. How well do you believe that the current mechanism allows for this goal to be achieved?*

100% good, I would change nothing
75% mostly good, however requires improvement.
50% hit and miss, and requires improvements
0% , it is designed as a performance management tool and does not trigger any recognition for high performance/s.

Do you agree with the following statement: I understand that under performance issues are managed by the current PDA process but little, if anything, appears to officially exist/occur for those that are recognised for their outstanding performance/s.*

Disagree,I believe that we are well recognised for the job we do.
Agree, I believe that this should auto trigger some form of recognition
Agree, I believe that there should be a reporting / celebrating standpoint.

Are you happy for the AFPA to contact you to discuss your idea?*

Yes
No

Phone*

CAPTCHA

Enterprise Agreement survey two

Performance Development Agreement Process